Project: Creator Spiritus Forums

June 11th, 2009

I know I haven’t posted for a while, but I’ve been kind of busy. I’ve been practicing of course, and starting up a new forum.

I will be posting about my piano lesson the other day, later, but first would like to announce my new forum. It is called the Creator Spiritus Forums.

I don’t like to write about religion here, because I’ve mostly written about programming and music, and don’t want to alienate any audience I might have. However, I am a very religious person, and enjoy writing about and discussing it.

For that reason, I started up CSF to have a place to discuss my religious journey, and attempts to live a Christ-centered life. Also to be a place to have engaging discussion with others, regardless if they have the same beliefs or not. I also want to write articles there, which will be featured on the front page.

It still needs some work, such as a logo, but I’m pretty happy with it as it is already. It was started last Friday, and already it has over 100 posts.

So that’s where I’ve been for the last week, trying to get this thing going. But now hopefully I can find some more time to write over here, too, on top of practice and everything else.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Lesson Journal: Lesson #27

June 9th, 2009

Tuesday, June 9, 2009

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

We had quickly finished up the Debussy prelude the week before, so we reviewed that to begin with. Everything seemed pretty good with that.

Then we went into the Italian Concerto. I was pretty excited about this, but it turned out to be very boring for some reason. It wasn’t nearly as fun as the Debussy prelude.

It was fairly easy, too. I of course am probably missing some of the subtleties with voicing and such, but technically it feels very easy to me, even easier than the prelude.

However, I learned 22 measures, which was almost the entire first page. I was pretty happy with that.

I really haven’t the first idea about how it is supposed to sound, so I’ll have to find some good recordings.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Lesson Journal: Lesson #25

May 29th, 2009

Friday, May 29, 2009

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

I had learned a lot of my the other day, so wanted to have a lesson to make sure I had learned it accurately, and to learn more.

She said she was busy, but should be able to see me in the morning. So I had a lesson at 8:00.

We went over what I learned myself, and it was mostly accurate. There were a few things that needed fixed here and there, especially with staccatos and such since the notation I was using to learn it didn’t mark the staccatos, but overall it was pretty accurate.

I’m not sure exactly which measure I got up to, but it was around 41 or 42 probably. It was right after those Ab’s repeated.

We continued on though, well into the third page. I got through one of my favorite parts at measure 58 where it says quasi tambour or something like that.

Nothing was really very difficult, nor hard to memorize, so I was happy about that.

I’m not sure whether I’ll learn more this weekend or not. Either way, I have another lesson on Monday.

If you enjoyed this post, make sure you subscribe to my RSS feed!

Practice Journal: Day #66

May 23rd, 2009

Friday, May 22, 2009

Session #218

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

218.1: :

I just worked on reviewing scales. I played them around the circle of fifths.

I am embarrassed to say I just recently learned what the circle of fifths is. I’m determined to try to commit it to memory, so that’s why I played them in this order.

Since in the music school, some people seem to play scales from F# and onward at a lower octave than the first six, I decided to play it by starting at C, then going down four, up five, and so on. That worked for the first six, until I landed on B, then I had to go down four again to F#, and continue the pattern from there.

With C and G, I played at mm=96, with four notes per beat, but then had to slow down to 92 for the rest of the scales.

I only did major scales today. I might introduce harmonic and melodic minor scales soon.

218.2: :

Next, I worked on a method that I found in a book, that I will post about soon.

Basically, you do each octave separately, but then add one note from the next octave, so that you can fit 8 notes in one beat, and land on the next beat. So for instance, with C major, you would go from C, to the D an octave above.

I started with Db, because that’s the scale it recommends that is the easiest. I started at mm=60, but that’s with 8 notes per beat instead of four, as I usually do.

I worked on each hand separately at first. Then after repeating 7 times perfectly, I would put them together a few times.

Using this method, I got through the first two sections, basically the first two octaves plus two notes.

Then I realized that with four notes per beat as we do at the music school, this is actually 120 BPM. Amazed that I had just blew by the goal of 112 required for jury, I set the metronome at 120 and tried it. It took a minute since there were more divisions than before, but then I was able to play it. Of course, it collapsed after the first two octaves since I have not worked on anymore yet.

I’m going to continue to work on this method, and see how it affects my other scales. It looks promising, though.

I’m still trying to figure out the best way to practice arpeggios, though. I wonder if there is something similar.

218.3: :

Just like in session #216.1, I worked on the first three measures.

It went a lot more easily this time. Again there was no problem in the first measure.

The second measure was also a lot easier. It felt much more even and clean.

In the third measure, again I had a slight problem with the second half of beat 4, but not nearly so often. Then, I noticed the movement my hand was making when it was even, and tried to replicate that. It seemed to work.

The left hand really had no problem in that section.

I do feel like this was better than yesterday. I am going to continue to use this method, and see how it is in a few days.

Statistics

  • Time: 06:05:52 PM-06:59:20 PM
  • Length: 0:53:32
  • Average session: 0:25:11
  • Session trend: 0:29:32

Session #219

Audio clip: Adobe Flash Player (version 9 or above) is required to play this audio clip. Download the latest version here. You also need to have JavaScript enabled in your browser.

219.1: : :

Just like in session #217.1, I worked up through the run in the beginning.

The very beginning, up until the run, went very easily. I made maybe one or two mistakes, but nothing major (no pun intended, lol).

The run went a little bit better, but I did spend more time on it, especially in the left hand, and especially in that descending part down to the A, before it goes into that down-up pattern.

I used the same method as before, but also copied the right hand. I played each separate section along with the corresponding section in the right hand, and that helped to make it more even and fast.

I realized that the second section in the left hand, where there is D-C-Bb, was a bit uneven. The C was grouping together with the Bb, and the D was kind of left out. That’s why that sounded so wrong when I was trying to speed that entire scale up.

I then worked on connecting each section again, which went a little better, but there is still a lot of tension there, so I am having trouble going too fast yet.

I didn’t get far into the actual arpeggio pattern after that, within the run, but this is the hardest part so that is OK.

219.2: :

I figured it was about time to actually work on Polichinelle.

I just started at the beginning, like all of the other pieces I’m working on. I got through the first 10 measures.

I had trouble with those little grace notes or whatever they are in the very beginning, making it sharp and crisp enough in both hands, as well as being accurate.

But after a bit of practice, I was well-pleased with my progress.

Surprisingly, the hardest part was in measures 7-10. I’m not sure why, because that isn’t a particularly difficult section, but still I had trouble.

It started to get a little uncomfortable in the right hand. That part has to be legato between the G’s and F#’s, so I’ve been using 1 and 4 on the F#’s, but that requires a bit of twisting of the hand, which is uncomfortable. I’m not sure if I’ll change that or not. It got very frustrating though, so I should have stopped and took a break and it probably would have been easier, but it seemed like it should be easy to begin with, so I persisted.

219.3: :

I haven’t touched this piece in ages, so I figured I’d work on it for 10 minutes or so.

I got through the first 10 measures. The hardest part was probably measure 10, because I had trouble making the left hand very accurate there for some reason. I did get it though, and it seems to be better.

Those 32nd notes in the beginning, especially in the left hand, are a little challenging, so I worked on making those consistent and even, too.

Overall, I am very happy with my progress.

Statistics

  • Time: 07:34:42 PM-08:27:51 PM
  • Length: 0:50:52
  • Average session: 0:25:18
  • Session trend: 0:31:40

Statistics

  • Today:
    • Time practiced: 1:44:24
    • Sessions: 2
    • Average session: 0:52:12
    • Longest session: 0:53:32 in session #218
  • Total:
    • Time practiced: 92:19:33
    • Average time per day: 0:37:57
    • Time per day trend: 0:46:43
    • Average sessions per day: 1.50
    • Sessions per day trend: 1.53
  • Estimates:
    • This week (week #21):
      • Time: 6:13:56
      • Sessions: 13
    • This month (May):
      • Time: 21:37:24
      • Sessions: 45
    • This year (2009):
      • Time: 233:20:40
      • Sessions: 554